The concluding moments of the movie Arbitrage current a morally ambiguous decision to the monetary crimes dedicated by Robert Miller, a hedge fund magnate. Quite than going through the total penalties of his actions, which embrace overlaying up an unintended demise and fraudulent accounting practices, Miller skillfully manipulates occasions to make sure his continued freedom and secures the sale of his firm. This conclusion leaves the viewers considering the attain of wealth and affect throughout the authorized system, and the potential for people in positions of energy to evade accountability.
The movie’s decision is important as a result of it challenges the viewers’s expectations for a typical crime drama. The shortage of a clear-cut justice reinforces the themes of corruption and the complicated moral compromises typically discovered throughout the world of excessive finance. It serves as a commentary on the potential for systemic failures to guard the susceptible and the pervasive affect of capital in shaping outcomes. The open-ended nature of the plot, which suggests ongoing unethical conduct, invitations reflection on real-world circumstances of economic misconduct and the often-elusive pursuit of justice.
The narrative’s fruits supplies a lens by which to look at numerous elements of the monetary system, together with regulatory oversight, company governance, and the impression of particular person selections on broader financial buildings. Subsequent discussions typically delve into the implications of such portrayals on public notion and the continued debate surrounding monetary ethics and accountability. These issues kind the premise for additional evaluation of associated subjects corresponding to company duty, authorized reform, and the position of media in shaping public discourse.
1. Ethical Ambiguity
Ethical ambiguity types a vital aspect of the narrative’s conclusion. The movie doesn’t ship a simple condemnation of its protagonist, Robert Miller. As an alternative, it presents a nuanced depiction of a flawed particular person working inside a compromised system. This ambiguity serves to unsettle the viewers and immediate reflection on the complexities of moral decision-making in high-stakes environments.
-
Unpunished Transgressions
Millers actions, encompassing monetary fraud and the concealment of a demise, would sometimes warrant extreme authorized repercussions. The narrative, nevertheless, depicts Miller evading these penalties, primarily by manipulation and the exploitation of systemic weaknesses. The shortage of direct retribution leaves the viewers grappling with the implications of unchecked energy and privilege.
-
Compromised Ethics as Norm
The movie means that compromised moral requirements are usually not aberrations throughout the world of excessive finance however quite an intrinsic facet of its operations. Millers conduct, whereas excessive, is offered as an extension of frequent practices. This portrayal implicates the broader monetary system in a tradition that usually prioritizes revenue over moral issues.
-
Viewers Discomfort
The movie’s unwillingness to supply a simplistic ethical judgment creates discomfort for the viewers. Viewers are challenged to reconcile Millers reprehensible actions along with his moments of charisma and obvious concern for his household. This discomfort underscores the movie’s exploration of the human capability for each good and evil, and the issue in assigning definitive labels of proper and unsuitable.
-
Systemic Implications
The absence of clear justice raises questions in regards to the integrity and effectiveness of the authorized and regulatory programs. Miller’s profitable maneuvering means that these programs will be manipulated by these with enough assets and affect. This portrayal prompts a essential examination of the buildings designed to make sure accountability and equity.
The ethical ambiguity inherent within the concluding scenes extends past particular person accountability to embody systemic failures. The unresolved questions surrounding justice and ethics function a pointed commentary on the potential for corruption and the challenges of attaining true accountability within the higher echelons of the monetary world. This complexity is a key takeaway from the movie and provokes continued debate on the character of economic ethics and the pursuit of justice.
2. Evasion of Justice
The concluding occasions of Arbitrage hinge on the protagonist’s profitable evasion of justice, a central aspect that defines the narrative’s final impression and thematic resonance. The way by which Robert Miller avoids authorized repercussions for each his monetary crimes and involvement in an unintended demise shapes the viewers’s interpretation of the movie’s commentary on wealth, energy, and systemic corruption.
-
Strategic Manipulation
Miller’s evasion depends closely on strategic manipulation of proof, witnesses, and the authorized system itself. He leverages his appreciable assets to obfuscate the reality, affect key gamers, and in the end divert blame onto others. This side displays real-world cases the place rich people and companies make the most of authorized loopholes and monetary energy to avoid justice.
-
Exploitation of Systemic Weaknesses
The movie illustrates how present weaknesses throughout the regulatory and authorized frameworks will be exploited to facilitate evasion. Miller identifies and capitalizes on loopholes in accounting practices and regulatory oversight to hide his fraudulent actions. This facet mirrors criticisms of insufficient regulation and enforcement throughout the monetary business.
-
Affect and Collusion
Miller’s capacity to keep away from prosecution is additional enabled by his affect over legislation enforcement and the media. His relationships with key people present him with entry to data and the capability to form the narrative surrounding his actions. This portrayal highlights the potential for collusion and conflicts of curiosity to undermine the pursuit of justice.
-
Ethical Ambiguity and Rationalization
The movie’s ending doesn’t supply a transparent ethical judgment on Miller’s actions. His rationalization of his conduct and the absence of a definitive comeuppance problem the viewers’s expectations for a typical crime drama. This ambiguity prompts reflection on the complexities of moral decision-making and the potential for people to justify morally questionable actions in pursuit of private acquire.
The sides of Miller’s profitable evasion of justice underscore the movie’s overarching critique of a system that seems to favor the rich and highly effective. By avoiding accountability for his actions, Miller embodies the potential for unchecked affect and the difficulties in attaining equitable justice throughout the monetary sector. The ending serves as a stark reminder of the systemic points that allow such evasion, leaving the viewers to ponder the implications of those realities.
3. Wealth and Affect
The fruits of Arbitrage inextricably hyperlinks wealth and affect to the protagonist’s capacity to avoid authorized penalties. Robert Miller’s intensive monetary assets function a direct facilitator of his escape from accountability. The narrative illustrates how wealth interprets into the capability to afford superior authorized illustration, manipulate public notion, and exert strain on people throughout the authorized system. Miller’s affect extends past monetary means; his social connections and established status afford him a stage of deference and credibility that much less prosperous people would doubtless not obtain. This dynamic underscores a recurring theme in real-world eventualities, the place entry to justice and equitable therapy below the legislation are sometimes compromised by socioeconomic disparities. Examples embrace circumstances of company malfeasance the place highly effective entities efficiently negotiate settlements or keep away from prosecution fully as a consequence of their capacity to mount formidable authorized defenses and affect public discourse.
The movie’s portrayal of this connection shouldn’t be merely a plot gadget, however a commentary on the structural inequalities that permeate many authorized and political programs. Miller’s actions spotlight how people with important wealth and affect can exploit vulnerabilities in these programs to their benefit, probably undermining the rules of equity and impartiality. For example, the capability to rent knowledgeable witnesses, fund intensive investigations, and foyer for favorable laws creates an uneven enjoying area, the place the result of authorized proceedings will be disproportionately influenced by monetary assets. This understanding is essential for analyzing the complexities of white-collar crime and the challenges in holding highly effective people and organizations accountable for his or her actions.
In the end, Arbitrage makes use of its ending for instance that the attain of wealth and affect extends far past mere monetary acquire, shaping the very mechanisms supposed to make sure justice. The movie serves as a cautionary story, prompting viewers to think about the moral implications of wealth disparity and the potential for systemic corruption when energy is concentrated within the palms of some. Addressing the challenges posed by this dynamic requires a essential examination of present authorized frameworks, marketing campaign finance laws, and moral requirements to advertise higher transparency and accountability throughout the monetary and political spheres.
4. Compromised Ethics
The conclusion of Arbitrage presents a stark depiction of compromised ethics throughout the higher echelons of finance. Robert Miller’s actions, each main as much as and through the closing scenes, are characterised by a constant disregard for ethical rules, highlighting the pervasive affect of self-interest and the potential for moral boundaries to be eroded by the pursuit of wealth and energy. These compromised ethics are central to understanding how Miller in the end evades justice and maintains his place.
-
Fraudulent Accounting Practices
Miller’s manipulation of his firm’s accounts constitutes a big breach of moral conduct. To hide monetary losses and misrepresent the corporate’s worth for an impending sale, he engages in fraudulent accounting practices. This demonstrates a willingness to deceive traders and regulators, prioritizing private acquire over transparency and moral monetary reporting. Actual-world examples embrace the Enron scandal, the place comparable accounting manipulations led to devastating penalties for workers and shareholders. In Arbitrage, this conduct types the muse for his later actions, creating an internet of deceit that he should navigate to keep away from detection.
-
Cowl-Up of Involuntary Manslaughter
The unintended demise of his mistress turns into one other essential juncture the place Miller’s ethics are profoundly compromised. As an alternative of taking duty and cooperating with authorities, he actively conceals his involvement, additional jeopardizing his ethical standing. This demonstrates a calculated choice to guard his status and monetary pursuits on the expense of human life and integrity. Parallels will be drawn to circumstances the place companies have tried to cowl up environmental disasters or security violations to keep away from legal responsibility. Within the film’s ending, the cover-up straight influences his negotiation energy through the sale of his firm.
-
Manipulation and Coercion
All through the movie, and notably within the concluding occasions, Miller makes use of his wealth and affect to govern people and coerce them into supporting his model of occasions. He leverages his connections to affect legislation enforcement, strain witnesses, and management the narrative surrounding the demise. This demonstrates a willingness to use his energy to guard himself, whatever the penalties for others. Actual-world examples embrace cases the place highly effective people have used their assets to silence victims of abuse or suppress unfavorable data. The ending of Arbitrage highlights how this conduct can allow the evasion of justice and perpetuate a tradition of impunity.
-
Justification of Unethical Conduct
Miller’s actions are pushed by a rationalization that his success justifies his unethical conduct. He convinces himself that his actions are needed to guard his firm, his household, and his personal future. This self-serving justification permits him to avoid his conscience and have interaction in actions that might in any other case be morally reprehensible. This resonates with circumstances of company executives who rationalize unethical selections as being in the very best pursuits of shareholders or the corporate’s long-term survival. Within the context of the film’s conclusion, it underscores the insidious nature of compromised ethics, the place people in positions of energy can persuade themselves that their actions are justified, even after they inflict hurt on others.
These sides of compromised ethics, exemplified by Miller’s conduct, in the end decide the trajectory of the movie’s ending. The evasion of justice is made attainable by these compromises, showcasing the far-reaching penalties of moral failures throughout the monetary world. Arbitrage thus serves as a cautionary story, highlighting the corrosive results of unchecked ambition and the hazards of prioritizing private acquire over ethical rules. The movie’s decision forces the viewers to confront the complicated relationship between wealth, energy, and moral duty, leaving them to query the true value of success.
5. Systemic Corruption
The movie Arbitrage, and particularly its concluding scenes, presents a story exploration of systemic corruption throughout the monetary business and the authorized system. The protagonist’s evasion of justice shouldn’t be merely a results of particular person actions however quite a consequence of deeply ingrained systemic points that permit these with wealth and affect to function exterior the bounds of the legislation. The film’s ending serves as a commentary on the potential for corruption to permeate numerous ranges of society, enabling the highly effective to keep away from accountability.
-
Affect of Wealth on Authorized Outcomes
The movie portrays how monetary assets will be deployed to govern authorized proceedings, affect witnesses, and safe favorable outcomes. Robert Miller’s capacity to rent costly attorneys, conduct non-public investigations, and leverage his connections inside legislation enforcement demonstrates how wealth can distort the pursuit of justice. Actual-world examples embrace circumstances the place companies have efficiently negotiated settlements or prevented prosecution altogether as a consequence of their capacity to mount formidable authorized defenses. In Arbitrage, this affect is pivotal in Miller’s capacity to deflect blame and evade prison expenses.
-
Regulatory Seize and Lack of Oversight
The narrative implicitly critiques the effectiveness of regulatory our bodies in overseeing the monetary business. Miller’s fraudulent accounting practices and questionable enterprise dealings go largely undetected till they’re on the snapping point, suggesting a failure of regulatory oversight. This displays real-world considerations about regulatory seize, the place regulatory businesses grow to be unduly influenced by the industries they’re meant to supervise, resulting in lax enforcement and an absence of accountability. The absence of strong oversight permits Miller to function with impunity, assured that his actions is not going to be scrutinized till it’s too late.
-
Erosion of Moral Requirements
The movie portrays a tradition by which moral issues are sometimes secondary to the pursuit of revenue and energy. Miller’s actions, in addition to the conduct of different characters throughout the monetary world, display a willingness to compromise moral rules for private acquire. This erosion of moral requirements contributes to a local weather of corruption the place people really feel emboldened to interact in unethical or unlawful conduct with out concern of reprisal. Within the context of Arbitrage, this moral decay creates an setting by which Miller’s actions are usually not solely attainable but in addition, to some extent, normalized.
-
Collusion and Complicity
Miller’s capacity to evade justice is facilitated by the complicity of others who’re keen to guard him, both out of loyalty, concern, or private acquire. From his staff who cowl up his monetary misdeeds to the cops who help in concealing proof, Miller depends on the willingness of others to show a blind eye to his actions. This collusion highlights the systemic nature of corruption, the place people grow to be entangled in an internet of deceit and self-preservation, perpetuating a tradition of impunity. The ending of Arbitrage underscores how this complicity permits Miller to flee accountability and preserve his place of energy.
These interconnected sides throughout the movie underscore the insidious nature of systemic corruption. Arbitrage’s ending reveals that particular person actions, whereas important, are sometimes symptomatic of broader societal points, and that addressing corruption requires a complete strategy that tackles not solely particular person misconduct but in addition the systemic components that allow and perpetuate it. The film serves as a strong reminder of the necessity for vigilance, moral management, and powerful regulatory oversight to fight corruption and promote accountability in any respect ranges of society.
6. Penalties Prevented
The concluding moments of Arbitrage are outlined by the protagonist’s success in evading important repercussions for his actions. This avoidance of penalties shouldn’t be merely a plot gadget, however a central element of the movie’s commentary on the dynamics of energy, wealth, and justice. The narrative construction establishes a direct causal hyperlink between Robert Miller’s preliminary misdeeds fraudulent accounting and the unintended demise and his subsequent efforts to evade duty. The deliberate absence of proportionate authorized or monetary repercussions emphasizes the movie’s critique of a system the place the rich can function with relative impunity. Actual-world examples, corresponding to cases the place massive companies negotiate settlements which are considerably much less punitive than the potential damages prompted, mirror this dynamic. The sensible significance of understanding this facet lies in its capacity to light up the potential for systemic imbalances throughout the authorized and monetary sectors.
The significance of “Penalties Prevented” as a element of the movie’s ending is multifaceted. Firstly, it challenges the viewers’s standard expectations of a decision that entails justice being served. As an alternative, the protagonist’s manipulation and affect allow him to avoid the authorized system, leaving viewers with a way of unease. Secondly, it highlights the inherent limitations of regulatory oversight and the potential for people in positions of energy to use loopholes for private acquire. This understanding is essential for analyzing real-world circumstances of company malfeasance and for advocating for stronger regulatory frameworks that promote accountability. Thirdly, the avoidance of penalties reinforces the movie’s thematic exploration of ethical ambiguity. By refusing to supply a easy decision the place the protagonist is punished, the movie prompts viewers to grapple with the complexities of moral decision-making and the potential for people to rationalize their actions.
In the end, the idea of “Penalties Prevented” serves as a microcosm of the broader systemic points explored in Arbitrage. The movie’s ending prompts essential reflection on the potential for corruption, the unequal utility of justice, and the erosion of moral requirements. Whereas the narrative presents a fictional state of affairs, its underlying themes resonate with real-world challenges associated to company accountability and the pursuit of equitable authorized outcomes. Recognizing the interaction between energy, wealth, and justice is essential for fostering a extra clear and accountable society, regardless of the inherent challenges concerned.
7. Private Duty
The decision of Arbitrage locations appreciable emphasis on the absence of private duty within the actions of its protagonist, Robert Miller. The movie meticulously particulars a sequence of selections predicated on self-preservation, from the falsification of economic data to the concealment of a vehicular manslaughter incident. The narrative conspicuously avoids portraying Miller going through the total authorized or social ramifications of those selections. This absence underscores the essential position private duty ought to play in sustaining moral and authorized requirements throughout the monetary sector and past. The avoidance of penalties, coupled with the movie’s open-ended conclusion, suggests a critique of a system the place private accountability is regularly overshadowed by wealth and affect.
The narrative trajectory of Arbitrage straight challenges the idea of particular person accountability. Miller’s selections, pushed by a want to guard his monetary empire and private status, have cascading results on others, together with traders, staff, and the household of the deceased. But, he skillfully manipulates circumstances to switch culpability, demonstrating a profound lack of private duty. This evasion is made attainable not solely by Miller’s wealth but in addition by the complicity of people inside his inside circle and the perceived vulnerabilities of the authorized and regulatory frameworks. Situations of company executives who prioritize short-term positive factors over moral conduct, typically on the expense of staff and stakeholders, present a tangible parallel. The sensible utility of this understanding lies in selling sturdy company governance, moral management coaching, and whistleblower safety mechanisms to foster a tradition of accountability inside organizations.
In essence, the movie Arbitrage makes use of the absence of private duty in its concluding scenes to underscore a broader systemic drawback. Whereas particular person actions contribute straight to moral breaches and authorized violations, the failure to carry people accountable perpetuates a tradition of impunity. The challenges of selling private duty within the face of highly effective financial incentives and potential authorized repercussions stay important. Addressing these challenges requires a multifaceted strategy, encompassing authorized reforms, enhanced moral schooling, and a societal shift in direction of valuing integrity over materials success. The movie in the end serves as a reminder that with out a dedication to non-public duty, programs designed to make sure justice and moral conduct are prone to manipulation and abuse.
8. Unresolved Pressure
The concluding moments of Arbitrage are basically characterised by unresolved pressure, a deliberate narrative technique intricately linked to the protagonist’s escape from full accountability. This pressure arises straight from the viewers’s consciousness of Robert Miller’s culpability in each monetary fraud and a demise, juxtaposed towards his obvious success in navigating the authorized system to keep away from extreme penalties. The unresolved nature of this pressure serves as a vital aspect in prompting viewers to ponder the broader implications of wealth and energy throughout the justice system. Quite than offering a cathartic decision, the movie leaves the viewers in a state of unease, reflecting a systemic imbalance the place the rich typically function below a special algorithm.
The significance of this unresolved pressure stems from its capacity to impress essential reflection on real-world eventualities involving company malfeasance and authorized ambiguities. The movie invitations a consideration of circumstances the place monetary establishments have been implicated in wrongdoing, but the people accountable hardly ever face proportional penalties. This pressure shouldn’t be merely a stylistic alternative however a calculated choice to underscore the challenges of attaining equitable justice in a society the place entry to authorized assets and political affect are sometimes skewed in favor of the rich. Moreover, the open-ended nature of the movie’s conclusion permits for numerous interpretations, encouraging dialogue in regards to the potential for systemic reform and the moral obligations of people in positions of energy. Examples embrace cases the place corporations settle out of court docket regardless of proof of misconduct, leaving victims and the general public with a way of unresolved injustice.
In abstract, the unresolved pressure in Arbitrage’s ending serves as a potent narrative gadget, forcing audiences to confront uncomfortable truths in regards to the intersection of wealth, energy, and justice. It highlights the persistent challenges in attaining accountability throughout the monetary sector and reinforces the necessity for vigilant oversight and moral management. The movie’s refusal to supply a neat decision underscores the complexities of systemic points and encourages continued scrutiny of the authorized and moral requirements that govern the conduct of people and establishments in positions of authority. Whereas the movie doesn’t present definitive solutions, its unresolved pressure serves as a catalyst for ongoing debate and demanding evaluation of the imbalances throughout the system.
Steadily Requested Questions
The next questions deal with frequent inquiries concerning the movie Arbitrage and, particularly, its concluding scenes. The intent is to make clear interpretations and discover the thematic implications of the narrative’s decision.
Query 1: What’s the central ambiguity offered by the ending of Arbitrage?
The first ambiguity resides within the protagonist’s profitable evasion of authorized and monetary repercussions for his actions. Regardless of clear proof of fraudulent exercise and involvement in a demise, Robert Miller manages to safe a profitable deal and keep away from prison expenses. This creates a ethical and moral quandary for the viewers.
Query 2: How does the movie’s decision problem standard expectations of justice?
The movie intentionally subverts expectations by not delivering a conventional, satisfying conclusion the place justice prevails. As an alternative, it portrays a system the place wealth and affect will be leveraged to avoid the authorized course of, leaving the viewers with a way of unease and questioning the efficacy of established establishments.
Query 3: What are the important thing thematic considerations underscored by Miller’s capacity to keep away from accountability?
The protagonist’s profitable evasion of penalties highlights themes of systemic corruption, the unequal utility of justice, and the erosion of moral requirements throughout the monetary sector. It prompts reflection on the potential for wealth and energy to distort the pursuit of fact and accountability.
Query 4: In what methods does the movie critique the effectiveness of regulatory oversight?
The narrative implicitly criticizes the perceived inadequacies of regulatory our bodies in overseeing the monetary business. The protagonist’s fraudulent actions go largely undetected till they’re on the snapping point, suggesting a failure of regulatory mechanisms to stop or detect misconduct.
Query 5: How does the ending contribute to the movie’s general commentary on ethical ambiguity?
The conclusion reinforces the movie’s exploration of ethical ambiguity by presenting a protagonist who’s neither fully villainous nor fully sympathetic. This deliberate ambiguity challenges viewers to confront the complexities of moral decision-making and the potential for people to rationalize questionable conduct.
Query 6: What real-world parallels will be drawn from the occasions depicted within the movie’s decision?
The movie’s depiction of wealth and affect shaping authorized outcomes resonates with real-world cases the place companies and rich people have efficiently negotiated settlements or prevented prosecution for alleged misconduct. It highlights the potential for systemic imbalances throughout the authorized and monetary sectors.
The open-ended nature of the movie’s conclusion serves as a catalyst for additional dialogue on company governance, authorized reform, and the moral obligations of people in positions of energy. The absence of a simple decision underscores the complexities and challenges inherent in attaining true accountability.
Additional investigation will delve into particular cases of company malfeasance and the continued debate surrounding moral conduct throughout the monetary business. The purpose is to supply a complete understanding of the problems raised by the movie Arbitrage.
Analyzing Arbitrage
The concluding scenes of Arbitrage supply a potent lens by which to look at the complexities of the monetary world and the moral issues that underpin it. Understanding the nuances of the movie’s decision requires a cautious consideration of its numerous parts.
Tip 1: Acknowledge the Significance of Ethical Ambiguity. The movie intentionally avoids a simplistic “good versus evil” narrative. Robert Miller is a fancy character, and his actions are usually not simply categorized. Analyzing this ambiguity is essential to understanding the movie’s message.
Tip 2: Scrutinize the Systemic Critique. Arbitrage shouldn’t be merely a narrative about a person’s transgressions. It supplies a commentary on the potential for systemic corruption throughout the monetary and authorized programs. Look at how the movie portrays the interaction between wealth, energy, and justice.
Tip 3: Contemplate the Theme of Penalties Prevented. The protagonist’s success in evading full accountability is central to the movie’s impression. Analyze how this avoidance of penalties serves to undermine standard expectations of justice and moral conduct.
Tip 4: Discover the Position of Private Duty. The movie underscores the absence of private duty in Miller’s actions. Replicate on the implications of this absence and its potential impression on moral requirements throughout the monetary sector and society at massive.
Tip 5: Consider the Affect of Unresolved Pressure. The deliberate creation of unresolved pressure within the concluding scenes forces viewers to confront uncomfortable truths in regards to the intersection of wealth, energy, and justice. Contemplate the position this pressure performs in prompting essential reflection.
Tip 6: Determine the Depiction of Compromised Ethics. The compromises made by Miller underscore the movie’s themes. Recognizing that selections are made with imperfect data supplies a framework for understanding actions during times of disaster.
Tip 7: Assess the Affect of Wealth. Wealth and energy are enabling components that permit unethical conduct to proceed. Contemplate how affect impacts selections and mitigates accountability.
By analyzing these particular parts, viewers can acquire a deeper understanding of the themes and messages conveyed within the movie. Arbitrage shouldn’t be merely a thriller, however a essential examination of the moral complexities inherent within the pursuit of wealth and energy.
This evaluation supplies a framework for decoding the movie’s conclusion and its broader implications, paving the way in which for additional exploration of associated themes and points.
Arbitrage
The previous evaluation has examined the assorted sides of Arbitrage’s concluding scenes, emphasizing the protagonist’s evasion of justice, the prevalence of ethical ambiguity, and the movie’s broader critique of systemic corruption. These parts converge to create a story that challenges standard expectations of justice and prompts reflection on the affect of wealth and energy throughout the authorized and monetary sectors.
The unresolved pressure and absence of clear accountability underscore the movie’s lasting impression, inviting continued scrutiny of moral requirements and the pursuit of equitable authorized outcomes. This evaluation serves as a reminder of the necessity for ongoing vigilance in addressing the complexities of economic integrity and making certain that programs of justice are usually not compromised by undue affect.
